(Preceded by the first five minutes of Cosmos series, Comet episode) There are lots of videos like the segment I just showed, and all
of them can challenge our faith. They
make us feel like we must be ignorant simpletons to believe in a God at
all. They imply that an enlightened
person should be beyond such silly nonsense as religion and faith and God. These messages are the norm of our
culture. They are the religion of our
society. Never for one minute believe
you live in a Christian society. You
don’t. You live in a secular humanist
society. It’s been that way for decades. And people love it! There’s very good reason for why people love
it, but we’ll come back to that later.
It is true that
it is impossible through scientific thought – or perhaps I should say, by using
empirically verifiable data - to prove the existence of God. Many take the inability to prove the
existence of God as proof that there is no God.
Many suggest that religion is a leftover of the ignorant past, and that
we would be better off if we got rid of it.
But books and videos like the one
we just watched play pretty fast and loose with their facts.
What they are
really doing is preying on your own ignorance of your own faith. If you watch that video segment a few times
and ask yourself some critical questions you discover that it falls apart
pretty fast. Indeed most scientific
critiques of religion, especially Christianity, play pretty fast and loose with
their facts.
Among the most
famous judges of Christianity is Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary biologist
from Oxford University. Interestingly,
when you read his works against religion you discover that while he is very
thorough in his study of biology, he seems to leave his critical thinking
skills behind when it comes to Christianity.
He chooses only that evidence which suits his predetermined views, and
ignores that which contradicts him. He’d
never get away with that in the field of biology, but far too many Christians
are too ignorant of their faith to be able to catch his bad scholarship in
religion; and he sells books by the millions.
There is
something deep in human nature going on here – this desire to get rid of God –
but again, we’ll come back to that.
I want to make
only one point with this sermon, especially for our confirmands. That is that an educated, scientific, critical
thinking person can use critical thought processes and conclude that Christian
faith is a mature and rational belief system. (repeat) That might seem like too simple a goal for
today, but you’ll find that for most of the people in our society today, Christian
faith is pure stupidity.
Even famous faith
critics like Carl Sagan can scientifically summarize the problem
succinctly. Every mature branch of
scientific thought has run up against a barrier – the inability to push
further. Perhaps the easiest is the idea
of the origin of the universe. If the
universe started with a big bang, or however it started, it must have an
origin. And what lies outside that
origin?
Critical thought
processes bump up against the barrier all the time. This is more than a lack of evidence. It is a universal barrier. Some people conclude that since we find no
evidence of God that therefore there must be no God. And I would agree with them that they have
come to a rational conclusion. However,
I will insist that as they have made that conclusion they have made a faith
statement. Without knowing it they have
created a faith statement - a conclusion without objectively verifiable data to
support their conclusion. And so from a
critical thought process I fully respect the beliefs of an atheist. But I also insist that that atheist recognize
that they have made a faith statement and also recognize that a highly
sophisticated religion like Christianity is also a rational belief system.
Notice that video
clip did not include ancient Hebrew religion – or Judaism. It did not include Christianity or
Islam. Most likely they did not include
such religions because they didn’t want to be outright offensive, but if they
would have made such a statement they would have walked into their own slaughterhouse.
I’m not an expert
in the most primitive forms of religion.
But I do know that by the time ancient religions like Judaism came
along, and they start to put their beliefs in writing, they were very rational
and highly sophisticated.
If you were
worshipping with us last summer you’ll remember that we read through much of
the book of Genesis. We discovered that
Genesis works at many levels. It is
vivid stories at a very simple level and can teach children very basic
things. But as you age you can revisit
the stories and discover they weren’t written to be literal truths. They were never intended to be. They are images and allegories. For example, Adam and Eve. Adam is not a name at all, but a
description. It means earthling, or
earth dweller, or even mud creature. Eve
is not a name either. It means
womb. The whole Garden of Eden story is
about exploring the root of human brokenness.
And then we discovered that not only are the stories allegories and
images, but the ancient Hebrews wrote with complex structures that create
comparisons and contradictions. You may
remember me saying that Genesis and other ancient Hebrew writings are the most
complex writings of the ancient world – even more complex than the philosophy
of the ancient Greeks; and certainly more complex than anything in current
literature. My point is that as far back
as we can trace the roots of our religion in written form – about 3000 years,
we encounter highly complex rational thought patterns. Their worldview is different, and they didn’t
have the precision instruments for measurement that we do today, but their
deductive reasoning was no less sharp.
And let’s
actually let that 3000 year old Adam and Eve story speak to the world of
today. What was their real sin? Eating the forbidden fruit? Yes, that’s the literal story answer. Disobeying God? That’s getting closer. Thinking they didn’t need God and they could
do better on their own? Yes, that’s the
point.
Modern day
secular humanism and the sociology that is its foundation drives the idea that
humans and the human intellect is supreme.
It can take care of itself. It
can and should be its own God. But wait,
that’s the whole point of the Adam and Eve story!!! That’s a 3000 year old story, but modern day
secular humanism acts like it’s a new thing.
It’s not. In fact it’s a very old
thing, and it’s a battle Christians have fought since the so-called
Enlightenment of the 18th Century.
Look at these books.
Here’s a playful one from the 21st Century: Exploding Stars,
Dead Dinosaurs, and Zombies – Youth Ministry in the 21st
Century. Go back to the 20th
Century and you find A Reasonable Faith but Tony Campolo – arguing the same
thing I am today. Go back to the 19th
Century and you find Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. And go back yet another century and you find
Friederich Schleiermaker’s Speeches on Religion to its Cultured Despisers.
The same issue,
over and over again.
There’s nothing
new in people saying they’ve outgrown God.
But statistics bear out that atheism is a dangerous belief system
indeed. Alan Padgett from Luther Seminary notes that more people were killed by atheist
movements in the 20th Century than Christianity killed in the
previous twenty centuries combined.
And so to our
confirmands and to us all I say, certainly keep a scientific head on your
shoulders. Use your critical thinking
skills. Apply them to everything,
including faith. I am saddened by how
weak and pathetic much of popular Christian belief is these days, and it needs
to be improved.
But never think
we’ve somehow become smart enough that we don’t need God. That’s a fool’s thought that we can document
has been tried for over 3000 years.
Instead, respect the rational conclusions of others, even when you disagree
with them, and never let anyone convince you that your Christian faith is in
any way lacking merit, strength, or reasonability.