November 27, 2016 1st
Sunday of Advent Matthew 1:1-17
The genealogy of Jesus may seem like
just a long list of hard to pronounce names, and who really cares? But when we look at it more closely we find a
lot of important lessons for our lives.
As we read through Matthew’s gospel we’re going to discover a lot of
things about him. Among them is that
he’s a very tidy writer and likes to put things in good order. He wants us to know Jesus ancestry and so it
puts it at a very logical place, the beginning!
Matthew’s gospel isn’t the only place in the Bible that gives a
genealogy of Jesus. Luke’s gospel does too, but Luke starts elsewhere and puts
the genealogy at chapter 3.
In coming weeks I’ll give you a
handout about the structure of Matthew.
We’ll discover that Matthew likes structure and he’s written his gospel
around a very sophisticated pattern. We
get a hint of that with the genealogy.
He wants us to recognize patterns with Jesus ancestors: fourteen
generations from Abraham to David, fourteen generations from David to the
conquest of Jerusalem by the Babylonians, and fourteen generations between then
and Jesus.
Much as Matthew might love structure,
he apparently didn’t do well in math. If
you count out the generations you realize he doesn’t actually list fourteen
generations in each segment. The third
segment contains only thirteen generations.
Nevertheless fourteen was a very important number for Matthew. Fourteen is the numerical value of King
David’s name in Hebrew. It is also twice
times the ideal number of seven.
Whatever the case, if we critically
look at Matthew’s genealogy of Jesus we do discover other problems. It doesn’t match up with Luke’s genealogy at
all. There’s no reconciling the
two. Plus not only is Matthew’s math
off, the divisions of 14 generations aren’t equal. The first covers 750 years, the second covers
400 years and the third covers 600 years.
He also skips four kings and one queen.
What does this mean? Does this mean that Matthew’s genealogy is
bogus and Matthew isn’t a reliable source for information? No.
Let’s use this as a lesson to understand more about Matthew.
Matthew’s gospel was most assuredly
written for a Jewish audience who had
accepted Jesus as the Son of God and converted.
As we go through the gospel we’ll discover how they are being persecuted
for their conversion; persecuted primarily by other Jews who reject Jesus. And we’re going to find just how fear-filled
their lives are. They’ve come to be
believers. It’s hard to say they’ve
converted to Christianity because Christianity is in its infancy at this point
and there’s no real structure. But Jesus
said he’d return. They thought it would
be soon, but his return is delayed, which heightens their fears all the more.
Most biblical scholars believe Matthew
was written around the year 80. Prior to
the year 70 Jews who had converted to Christianity appear to have remained
welcome among Jewish communities.
There’s evidence that Jewish Christians would still worship with Jews in
the synagogues on the Sabbath – which was Saturday. Then on Sunday the Christians would have a
second worship.
But if you remember your history well
you’ll remember that in the year 64 Rome burned. Emperor Nero, who was probably insane, was
looking for a scapegoat. Christians got
blamed and persecution of them began.
Still, this didn’t affect outlying areas like Judea a whole lot. But then in the year 70 the Romans burnt the
temple and totally destroyed Jerusalem as punishment for Jewish revolts. It was a tumultuous time for Jews. They cast Christians out of their synagogues
and the two religions went their separate ways.
Well discover that as Jesus predicted,
families were torn apart. Friendships
were destroyed. A lot of people were
being hurt. This is the life of the
people Matthew is writing to. There are
a few fundamental things he wants these people to know. The way he’s structured the genealogy speaks
to that.
He wants his readers to know that what
is happening is not really chaotic. It
is orderly. It is part of God’s orderly
and structured plan.
Very importantly, he does not want his
readers to feel like Jesus has abandoned them just because he hasn’t returned
as quickly as they had hoped. Remember
always, Matthew likes patterns and he writes with structure. He wants his readers to know that God didn’t
just pop into the world for a short time and then just pop back out after the
resurrection. No, the genealogy shows
how God has deeply rooted himself into history – into our history. Even though the genealogy goes to Joseph, and
thus shows no actual DNA connection to Jesus, for Matthew this is an important
connection. Our human story and God’s
story are one in the same.
And though the genealogy itself
doesn’t point it out, Matthew wants us to know that God is still very much with
us and that our story is still God’s story.
Matthew begins the gospel with a genealogy and do you remember the final
words of the gospel? Jesus says, “And
remember, I AM with you always to the end of the age. Matthew’s fearful community is not lost or
forgotten. They are not unimportant to
God. And the same goes for us too.
Now let’s take a little time to look
at the actual people in the genealogy.
Some of them you may recognize.
Matthew starts with Abraham. We
know him. He’s the one God made the
covenant with that his ancestors would become God’s people. We also know Isaac and Jacob.
We recognize some of the kings: David
and Solomon. Josiah may stand out. He is arguably the most righteous king in all
of Jewish history. There are a number of
people that we do not know, but you’ll find their names in Old Testament
stories. And then there are a lot of
people recorded nowhere else. We have no
way of verifying them at all.
Some of the people in the genealogy
are very virtuous – like King Josiah and Boaz.
And some not so much – like King Solomon. Many of the kings listed were just plain
bad. Some people are manipulative
scoundrels like Jacob. Some, like
Abraham, are filled with faith. Some are
killers like King David.
All in all, we ask ourselves, is
Jesus’ genealogy one of picture perfect virtuous people? Is God willing to claim only the
righteous? No. Rich/poor, good/bad, known/unknown, all are
included. God wants us to know he is
rooted in the same messy reality we live in, not something perfect. God will come into this world as a human
connected to all the imperfections of the past.
God embraces and claims as his own both our good and our bad.
There’s one more thing I want to point
out about the genealogy. It’s almost all
men as you’d expect a genealogy from that time.
But strangely, four women appear, and a fifth is eluded to. If you know these women well you’ll know
there is a common thread among them. And
believe me, if you are a woman you do not want to be among them!
There’s Rahab, the prostitute in
Jericho who turns traitor against her own people to help the Israelites conquer
the city. Bathsheba isn’t mentioned, but
she’s eluded to in verse 6 where she’s called the wife of Uriah. You probably know the less than virtuous
stuff that went on between her and King David.
Still, if you’re creating a movie you can depict it and still get a
PG-13 rating.
Then there’s Tamar. We find out about her in Genesis 38. I won’t give details because we like to keep
sermons family friendly. You’ll have to
read about her yourself, but again, if you’re making a movie, you can depict
her and still pull off a PG-13 rating but you’re flirting with R territory.
And then there’s Ruth. I simply can’t talk about what goes on when
she meets Boaz. We read about her in Ruth
chapters 2 to 4. While the author there
uses euphemisms to refer what she and Boaz got up to in the dark, if you’re a
movie maker and you want to do the scene justice, let’s just say you may go
beyond an R rating.
So what company does that put the fifth
woman, Mary, among? The notes in my
study Bible say that the women all have “irregular sexual unions” but are
considered important for God’s plan. Who
knew there was so much spice in Jesus’ ancestry!?!
With Jesus firmly rooted into our
reality Matthew has prepared us for him to be born, which we’ll look at next
week.
No comments:
Post a Comment